|

Leadership Acumen: Issue 6, January, 2003
Banff Executive Leadership Inc.
Leadership
Deployment vs. Leadership Development
"Eighty
percent of success lies in showing up!"
- Woody Allen
"A
mediocre plan well implemented will outperform the
most brilliant plan accompanied by mediocre implementation."
In last
month's Leadership Acumen, we looked at the overwhelming need
for Leadership Development today. As we kick-off 2003, let's
build off last month's topic and see how we might show a better
'return on investment' and actually enhance the leadership practices
in our organizations.
So much education, so little competence
Why is it, that at a time when we have the most educated leaders
and population in history, we still have so much trouble effectively
leading change, motivating teams, supporting innovation, thinking
and acting strategically, and calling forth the ingenuity required
to solve our pressing challenges - even at the most senior levels?
Why is it,
so many managers can take program after program, attend numerous
seminars or conferences, and still not improve their leadership
effectiveness?
Some of
the answers lie first in understanding the difference between
education and competency.
Education helps a person know and understand theory, relationships,
history, dependencies, etc. It should help one think better,
drive out ignorance, and should help individuals widen their
perspective.
Competency
on the other hand is an assessment of an individual's ability
to match the right behaviour and practices, and apply their
knowledge appropriately in decisions with respect to the situation
at hand. More than this, one is seen as competent if these actions
and wisdom are applied in a manner expected or valued by the
observers and the surrounding community.
Therein
lays the rub. Education does not equal competency. Nor actually,
is it a reliable predictor of competency. In the realm of Leadership
Development, Executive Development, Board Governance Improvement,
even Strategic Planning, theory and education is not enough.
We must be concerned about how the participants in developmental
efforts will implement their learning, and apply their new wisdom
in day-to-day practices that will meet (or exceed) the expectations
of the community around them.
We can see
this in the case of a senior executive that is a 'star' in one
organization, being recruited away to another organization;
yet within a year, being clearly found to be not working out
in the new organization. The issue is not the executive's knowledge.
It is their ability to adapt and apply the practices and actions
that are expected or most suitable for the new corporate culture,
or challenges faced by the industry sector, or different dynamics
of the local community. Of course, this phenomenon is not isolated
to individuals that switch organizations. With the fast pace
of change in business today, ever-rising expectations from customers,
new-entrant competitors, advancing technology, and more, it
is possible that an executive's current competence can be overtaken
by changing community conditions. Consequently, there is a great
need for continuous learning and improvement of senior leaders,
Board members and other staff as well - and then effectively
applying new practices in-situ.
Taken together,
education and competent practice forms the basis for the ever-needed
ingenuity for our organizations and communities.
Are we truly engaging the skills we have?
As Woody Allen has been quoted in saying, a large degree of
success comes from just showing up. We often experience difficulty
in getting our people (and executives) to show up mentally,
physically and emotionally together in today's workplaces. The
other 20% - 40% of engagement however is the mark of difference
between a mediocre leader and an inspiring, effective one.
Let's face
it; leading change effectively doesn't happen just by showing
up. It takes a different effort, beyond the status quo, to make
a change happen. It takes extra inspiration to innovate a new
product or service. It requires an extra measure of passion
and commitment to implement the new strategic plan and achieve
a bold new sustainable vision.
Yet, the
knowing-doing gap is rampant today. The number of mediocre organizations
vastly outweighs the number of excellent, progressive ones.
Of the thousands of individuals and many organizations I have
worked with over the years, I like to believe that most of them
have had extraordinary impact and effect in their organizations
and communities. However, despite all our efforts to support
practical application of new practices - often up to 6 and 12
months after a program - a large percentage of well motivated
and well meaning leaders still end up having limited success
in implementing their own plans for improved leadership practice.
Why?
Why is it
so difficult to actually deploy the leadership practices that
we have been taught? Did the leaders of Enron not know that
their financial affairs should be conducted differently? Of
course they did. Did the Board members and CEO of Hydro One
not know that the compensation package and expense practices
of their CEO were excessive and unreasonable? Of course they
understood. Do intelligent Board members that 'dip' into the
affairs of the organization a few days a month (or a quarter)
really think they know how to run the organization better than
the CEO/management team that lives it 24/7/365? That would be
foolishness. Does a senior leader really think that the new
strategic plan, or global competitiveness initiative, or new
partnership strategy will happen by conducting their affairs
the same next year as they did last year?
That's why you are paid the big bucks*!
Executive compensation has skyrocketed in the past 20 years
compared to the average wage-earner. We have convinced ourselves
and society that the salaries are warranted for the extra effort
required, the difficulties and risks that come with the job,
and so on. Unfortunately, the community and workers are starting
to rebel. They don't see the extra efforts, the ability to successfully
handle the complexities, nor any downside risks for members
of the leadership cadre that fail. We consistently see people
promoted based on who they know, a dynamic 'presence', or professional
expertise, rather than any proven leadership competency. Then
we wonder why there is poor morale, lack of attention to the
customer, or lack luster performance in the departments for
which they are responsible.
Deploying
leadership practices in an intelligent, appropriate, adaptive,
strategic, mobilizing, and inspiring manner is not easy. It
IS easy to "parrot" the words of empowerment, innovation,
leadership, governance, duty of care, value added, network collaboration,
partnership
It is easy to lead an organization, people,
teams when everything is going your way. It is much harder to
BE the leader and to exert adaptive leadership when transformation
is required, to identify a path forward when the competitive
landscape is changing, and reinvent strategy when the global
economic assumptions are proving ineffective for the future.
The writers of newspaper executive recruitment ads certainly
understand this!
So; let's
look at some of the things that prevent leaders from leading,
applying what they know, and some approaches we might take as
leaders to better deploy what we have learned.
Constraints against effective Deployment of Leadership Practices
The act of leadership requires one to step forward and offer
up their service, commitment and extra effort to enhance the
condition of community. This first act in itself is difficult
for several, very real, personal reasons:
- It may
be more comfortable to just do what is 'normal' and not offer
anything extra
- It may
be culturally difficult to be seen to step forward - in Japan
they have the saying "the nail that sticks it's head
up gets hammered down".
- People
may actually feel they aren't qualified to lead, despite their
title
- The establishment
and status quo may appear too overwhelming to challenge
- We may
worry about our personal safety or at least alienation from
team members
- Aversion
to enhanced responsibility and its attendant accountability
- Self-perception
as a non-leader - a manager, super sales person, technical
expert, etc.
- We may
be energy-depleted due to the arrival of a new baby in the
household, or the attention to aging parents, or distractions
due to relationship difficulties with our partner
- There
is very limited added benefit to leading vs. following (i.e.
only a 0 - 5% pay raise)
Another
aspect of deploying Leadership means that you will likely have
to challenge the status quo or lead others in an adaptation
initiative in response to major threat that takes you all into
uncharted territory. Blocks to asserting leadership in this
kind of situation include bigger issues:
- More
visible, tangible rewards to staying in the 'old' model
- Current
leaders putting roadblocks in the way of new leaders
- Lack
of role models to emulate, lack of clarity as to what will
be required for success
- Inability
to turn theory into practice
- Intimidation
from others who aspire to the leadership role(s)
- The more
'public' exposure of your own faults and failures
- Intellectual
readiness for handling complexity, ambiguity, and making decisions
that will impact a large number of others.
Despite
the huge number of books published each year on this topic,
there is no 'six-point' recipe to effective leadership for all
situations! Actually, I continue to be amazed by the number
of individuals in every session I lead, which approach me and
ask for the one 'best' way to be a better team leader, or implement
innovation practices, or develop a strategic plan. Indeed, every
organization, and each challenge requires a somewhat different
approach in finessing the leadership actions required by each
unique context. While we can learn a lot from other people's
successes and failures, we can't simply replicate someone else's
actions for a different situation! Obstacles to effective leadership
deployment in this aspect include:
· Assumptions that there is one 'right' way of handling
a complex adaptation situation
· Lack of willingness to believe in one's own judgment
and experience
· Managing tasks, people and resources around an old
context and notion that one person can know enough to have all
the answers; when Adaptive Leadership requires the facilitation
of processes and encouragement of teams of people in the exploration
of the issue and alternative solutions toward more collaborative
and multi-perspective decision-making
· Belief that a solution from an entirely different (past)
context can be simply applied to the current context and situation.
(If leadership was that easy, we would have far more successes
that we witness.)
· Getting so caught up in carrying out our own 'tasks'
or playing the political games, that we forget (or de-prioritize)
the more important human interactions and human resources leadership
elements.
Use both theory and reality in applying Leadership
In theory we have few obstacles to effective leadership. Indeed,
theoretically we can easily study past situations, apply 20/20
hindsight, identify how things should have been handled and
then apply forward our insight to create a prescription of how
to handle future challenges. In the heat of the decision-making
moment, unfortunately, we rarely have the benefit of 20/20 perspective
over our current situation, nor do we usually have the time
to exhaustively analyze and think through all the possible consequences.
Also, the priorities and perspectives of the decision maker(s)
are significantly impacted by the thinking styles and values
of those involved at the time - and their formative experiences
leading up to that moment.
Most of
the real success in expressing leadership happens at the interface
between theory and reality, in the midst of paradox where theory
and reality don't match, and in the swirl of very personal and
interpersonal difficulties, conflicts and differences of opinion.
To throw
out theory and completely 'wing it' is as dangerous as taking
a simple, impersonal, 'cookbook' approach. Leadership for tomorrow
requires a blend of the two.
In various
sessions with executives, I have asked them to imagine what
advice they might give to a relative that is being challenged
to step into a senior leadership role, and calls you for your
help. Your answers to this question are as good as anything
I might bring forward from my own experience. This advice offered
is also a good reminder to all of us as to how we can deploy
more effective leadership practices this coming year:
- Stand
up for what you believe in. Look for consistency between your
own beliefs and the values of the organization or community
looking for your leadership. Make sure you know what is in
your heart, and draw upon this for the courage, passion, and
desire to step up and lead
- Realize
that leadership is not about the destination, it is about
the journey. Be adventurous, be observant, listen to the ideas
and experiences of others. Be prepared to make mistakes, but
turn them into learning experiences and move forward with
the insight these set-backs provide.
- Take
one step at a time. You don't have to solve everything at
once, or indeed all by yourself. You don't have to get it
100% right at the start either. It is more important to get
started, then improve and adapt over time.
- Consider
"What are the benefits?" and also "What do
you really have to lose by stepping forward?"
- Be conscious
of the obstacles you may be putting in front of yourself.
Are your assumptions reasonable or just worries? What do you
have to do to remove them and step forward?
- Ensure
you have a 'sponsor' or support group. Being a leader is often
lonely work, and we all need a support system to help us out.
- Examine
your motives. Be comfortable with the reasons you would use
to justify stepping into leading.
- Communicate,
Communicate, and Communicate! {And check that your communication
is actually being received/interpreted in the manner you intended!]
- Once
you decide to go for it; suck it up, be assertive, confident
and positive.
To these
suggestions I would add:
- The first
suggestion above I love, and would add: lead from the heart
not the head! Do the kinds of things you know in your heart
are right, as opposed to thinking about what others might
be expecting, or what will be politically correct.
- Energy
- the effective management of one's own energy, and the energizing
of your followers is absolutely crucial. This means recognizing
your own energy patterns and when best to take certain courses
of action. It also requires you to look after yourself and
your own sustainability of energy. Get the positive energy
flowing around you and in the people you lead!
- Get real.
Get personal. Get genuine. Leadership is best when the leader
is realistic, engages with people at a very personal level,
and is respected for being genuine and walking his/her own
talk. Admit mistakes, and work hard to fix them right away.
Be forgiving and supportive when others make mistakes.
- None
of the really important things in human history have been
easy to accomplish. Since the core of leadership is really
about leading adaptation or changing practices, realize that
there will be some pain for every gain.
- Recognize
that in change situations you have to start by maintaining
the status quo (temporarily) while at the same time considering,
planning, and then implementing the new elements on top of
the existing work. This can not possibly be done in the previous
normal work hours or with the same effort as before.
- Slow
things down. This can seem awfully difficult in the midst
of the vortex. But it is crucial. You must make time to engage
others, listen to their concerns, ideas, and counsel. People
naturally resist changes imposed upon them without their input.
- Refuse
to make important, big decisions all by yourself. Refuse also
to make the decisions for others that should be able to make
their own decisions. (Even though it might seem very easy
for you to do!) Today's complexity requires more collaboration
and involvement of many perspectives in the important, high
impact decisions. Also, in empowering others, you have to
let them make their own decisions. Every time you take back
the decision-making from someone you are trying to empower,
(even though they may be asking you to), you are taking back
power and reducing empowerment overall.
- Invest
time up-front to build "team" and build the environment
and capacity for front-line decision-making and empowerment
- along with accountability. [Resist the urge to drive for
results too soon!] To effectively lead change and take a network
leadership approach, means that you have to rise up a level
and let others make the more day-to-day decisions. This allows
you to cast a wider scan for improved perspective. It allows
you to energize and cross-connect people in the broader network
of customers, suppliers, stakeholders, etc. If you are constantly
required to direct "groups" or individuals -- holding
the focus and providing the lead decision-making, you will
be unable to lift yourself up to a higher level of leadership.
- Smile!
Ethics and Values have always been important; today they
are front and center
Finally, leadership deployment is not only about applying education
and appropriate leadership practices. Just because you CAN do
something, or some law doesn't expressly forbid you from doing
what you are considering, doesn't mean you should take that
course of action. (Witness the current controversy regarding
cloning of animals and humans.) Leadership competency is a combination
of intelligent thinking, appropriate practices, and the expression
of sustainable values and ethics.
If a leader
(or potential leader) isn't aware of their own values and beliefs,
how will they convincingly express values, believably impassion
others, and facilitate their engagement to co-create/support
new ideas and Vision?
2003 and beyond!
January 2003 of course marks the start of a new year. And, the
New Year often brings forward resolutions on how we might change
past practices or implement new behaviours.
So far,
2003 is shaping up to be just as difficult and unsettling as
2002 for many organizations and communities around the globe.
There are major leadership forces all around us still trying
to apply old approaches and contexts to the challenges of today
and tomorrow - in such an obviously deficient manner! Thankfully,
there are also numerous leaders fostering ingenuity and implementation
of new practices.
Perhaps
look around you and watch some of the most dynamic, positive,
and effective leaders you can find to inspire you. Then think
about what you might DO differently, or what new practices you
might deploy this year, to improve your leadership competency?
All the
best of success for 2003!
Banff Executive
Leadership Inc. offers public and customized programming to
improve Board Governance and Executive Leadership Practices.
We also provide coaching and consulting services to Boards and
Executives to help enhance their leadership practices. Please
contact us if we can be of further assistance.
If you found
this article useful, please forward the article's web link to
a friend!
|